Metode Kritik Sanad (Naqd Al-Sanad)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69834/dn.v15i2.377Keywords:
Tsiqah, Syaz, ‘IllatAbstract
Sanad is one of the most important elements of hadith, as it is well known that a hadith consists of three main components: sanad, matan, and rawi. As the second highest source of Islamic law after the Qur’an, hadith requires a high level of credibility in order to serve as a legal foundation and guidance for Muslims. Therefore, the existence of the sanad is crucial because it functions as the chain of transmission that connects a hadith to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). This element of sanad has often been the subject of criticism and in-depth study by scholars, since the quality of the sanad largely determines whether a hadith is accepted or rejected.
In the early period of Islam, the transmission of hadith was generally based on mutual trust between students and their teachers. However, as Islam spread and various interests emerged, scholars found it necessary to establish specific methods and principles for critically examining hadith. The criticism of the sanad is guided by several key criteria: continuity of the chain (ittishal al-sanad), narrators must be classified as tsiqah, encompassing the qualities of ‘adl (integrity) and dhabit (accuracy), the absence of irregularities (shadh), and the absence of hidden defects (‘illah).
If all narrators in a hadith fulfill these criteria, the sanad is considered sahih. Subsequently, the hadith must still undergo matan criticism to determine its final quality and its eligibility to serve as a hujjah in Islam.
References
Ali, M. (2016). Sejarah kedudukan sanad dalam hadis Nabi. 7(1), Juni.
Ali, M. (2019). Kajian sanad. 6(2), Januari.
al-Khatib, M. ‘A. (1989). Ushul al-?ad?s: ‘Ul?muhu wa mu??ala?uhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Arifin, Z. (2018). Kritik sanad hadis (Studi Sunan Ibnu Majah, Kitab az-Zuhud). 14(2).
Aziz, E. (2017). Fitrah perspektif hadith: Studi kritik sanad, matan, dan pemahamannya. 14(1), Januari–Juni.
Hakim, L. (2021). Relevansi kritik sanad dalam studi hadis kontemporer. Jurnal Studi Hadis, 8(2).
Halim, H. M. A. (2014). Langkah umum kegiatan ta?q?q hadis. 11(30).
Huda, M. N. (2022). Pendekatan historis dalam kritik sanad hadis. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 6(1).
Ilyas, A., & Ahmad, L. O. I. (2013). Pengantar ilmu hadis (Cet. II). Surakarta: Lembah Harapan Press.
Ilyas, Y., & Mas’udi, M. (1996). Hubungan hadis dan al-Qur’an: Tinjauan segi fungsi dan makna. Dalam Perkembangan pemikiran terhadap hadis. Yogyakarta: LPPI Universitas Muhammadiyah.
Imtyas, R. (2018). Metode kritik sanad dan matan. 4(1), Juni.
Ismail, M. S. (1988). Kaedah keshahihan sanad hadis: Telaah kritis dan tinjauan dengan pendekatan ilmu sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Ismail, M. S. (1992). Metodologi penelitian hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Kurniawan, A. (2023). Kritik sanad hadis dan validitas historis periwayatan. Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(2).
Mustofa, A. (2024). Integrasi kritik sanad dan matan dalam kajian hadis modern. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 12(1).
Nadhiran, H. (2016). Kritik sanad hadis: Tela’ah metodologis. 15(1), April.
Nasrullah. (2007). Metodologi kritik hadis (Studi takhr?j al-?ad?s dan kritik sanad). 4(4), Desember.
Nuha, U. (2013). Kritik sanad: Sebuah analisis keshahihan hadits. 5(1), Juni.
Rahman, F. (t.t.). Ikhtisar mu??ala?u al-?ad?s. Bandung: PT Alma’arif.
Rohman, A. (2021). Metodologi naqd al-sanad dan implikasinya terhadap hukum Islam. Al-Qalam, 38(2).
Sahputra, H. (2022). Pemikiran kritik sanad hadis. 5(1), Januari–Juni.
Zubaidah. (2015). Metode kritik sanad dan matan hadis. 4(1), Juni.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abubakar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

